We have revolutionized the concept of sensitivity, adopting a new technology that aims at the purity of the impact with the ball. We make the rackets all in a single frame without adding pallets or polyurethane foam, with the frame entirely in graphite, from the tip to the handle, without interruptions. Unibody allows the best possible transmission of the feeling upon impact with the ball, returning sensitive feedback to the tennis player’s arm. We believe that feeling is the first thing to look for in a racket and that is why Unibody offers the maximum possible connection with the racket, because the handle is part of the racket itself.
I’m not sure this is why I prefer the feel of these racquets over the predecessors, but they do feel more solid and well-constructed.
Donnay Pro One 97
(the one on the right)
The Pro One 97 is a racquet for advanced players looking for control and comfort. You have to be able to generate your own power to successfully play with this racquet. I did enjoy the control, but struggled with the small sweet spot. My hitting partner Matthew, a better player, really enjoyed this one however. He usually plays with the Pure Aero VS and enjoyed the added control and comfort.
Specifications on average
Head size: 97sq”
Unstrung Weight: 305g
Unstrung Balance: 315mm
Strung Weight: 317.5g
Strung Balance: 5 Points HL
Strung Swing Wt: 314
String Pattern: 18×20
Stiffness ratings are not made for Donnay Racquets, as they feature Dynamic Stiffness
Grip: Cushion
Rec. String Tension: 45lbs (+/- 10)
Beam Width: 21/21/21mm
Length: 27
Technology: Hexacore XeneCore™
This racquet felt more solid and slightly stiffer than the predecessor. I definitely preferred this one. The strung swing weight was spot on for me at 327. But you do need to be an advanced player of at least 4 on a scale of 7 to play with this frame.
Donnay Formula 100
This was my favorite racquet, the last time I tested these frames. Donnay calls it their Pure Drive killer. It’s powerful, but much softer than other racquets in the category, which makes it’s not quite easy to generate free depth with, but enough for most players.
I was a bit unlucky with the swing weight of the racquet I received for review. It was 334 strung with MSV Co-Focus Hex Ultra 1.25 at 51 lbs or 23 kg. My fellow playtesters (stronger players) thought that was fine for the most part, but I struggled with the racquet when playing against advanced players hitting fast balls. I think a more reasonable swing weight would have been 320-325. But this is the issue with quality control plaguing most brands (and players) these days.
The racquet played with good power, feel and comfort, but was a bit sluggish due to the higher swing weight of my racquet.
This is the most flexible of all the racquets. I thought it was difficult to control the predecessor, but liked this Unibody version much better. Actually so much so that it was my favorite racquet in the play-test.
Easy power, spin, but not too much and fantastic Clash-like arm comfort. A very nice stick for players who want some free depth without sacrificing the risk of tennis elbow. Mine had a swing weight of 313 strung, which is kind of perfect for the racquet it is.
View Comments
Any thoughts on how the unibody 102 would perform after customization to your normal specs?