Here you’ll find tennis shoe reviews by tennisnerd which can help you to buy the right kind of tennis shoe for your feet and game.
There are some new tennis shoes from HEAD on the market. I’m currently testing the Revolt Pro 4.0 and the Sprint Pro 3.5.
A couple of years ago, I mainly wore Asics or Nike Vapor Tours. They are still good shoes, but my daily drivers on the rough hard courts of Malta are the Sprint line from HEAD. Previously I used the Revolt because they are more durable, but comfort and speed-wise, I think the Sprint is my favorite. These lines have recently been updated, so let’s look at these new tennis shoes from HEAD.
This post will deal with what makes the Sprint different from the Revolt and what is the audience for these shoes? Let’s start with the Revolt Pro 4.0.
HEAD Revolt Pro 4.0 tennis shoes
The Revolt series from HEAD is mainly about extreme durability and comfort. It’s a roomy shoe that lasts a long time. I have tried several generations of the Revolt Pro, and they’ve been a good fit for my foot and game.
You can check the facts and tech of the shoe straight from HEAD.
These shoes are sturdy, solid, comfort-oriented, and durable. I always feel steady on the court with these shoes on, and I never worry about slipping or losing grip. It’s all about support, which is enhanced by the lockdown strap.
The width of the shoe is about medium (don’t worry about your toes being mashed together, it’s a pretty roomy shoe), the arch is low-ish, and you’re not going to need much of a break-in period. They feel good straight from the first hit to me.
As you can see from the reviews on Tennis Warehouse, this is one of HEAD’s bestsellers. It doesn’t matter if you use it for pickleball, padel or tennis – it’s a solid all-court shoe.
The weight of this shoe is on the heavy spectrum at 386g approx, so if you’re looking for a “fast” and light shoe, this ain’t it.
HEAD Sprint Pro 3.5 tennis shoes
This is a low-to-the-ground speed-focused shoe. No break-in, just put them on and start springing around the court. The support is not bad but can’t quite be compared to the sturdiness and lock-in feel of the Revolt Pro.
They have re-engineered the mesh and tongue material to improve comfort over the previous version (which was already very comfortable to me). There is half-sock system (not full-on like the Wilson amplifeel) but it helps to “hug the foot”.
The HEAD Sprint Pro 3.5 is a far lighter shoe at 339.7 grams over the Revolt and is noticeable on the court. The comfort level is higher on the Revolts, but you will move faster with these. I don’t find the stability bad, though, because otherwise, my aching and aging knees would complain.
You can check out more facts or purchase them at Tennis Warehouse or HEAD.com
I think the 3.5 is a slight improvement over the 3.0 SF that I used previously. I would say a better fit and comfort and I would hope durability too. Shoes break pretty quickly for me on the gritty hard courts I play on 4-5 times a week, but performance is important too. I hope that the Sprint Pro 3.5 has found the perfect middle ground between speed and durability.
Summary
So the difference between these shoes is pretty straightforward. Do you want a lighter, low-to-the-ground, fast feel? The HEAD Sprint Pro 3.5 is worth considering. While, the HEAD Revolt Pro 4.0 is your best bet if you want stability and durability.
I have a hard time choosing between these two. I like to feel speedy on the court, but I’m also extremely keen on support, especially when playing on hard courts.
Let me know if you would consider any of these two. Or maybe there is another shoe or shoe brand that you prefer?
. When I heard about the launch of the Gel Resolution 8 I was super excited to get the chance to try them out in advance, thanks to Asics Sweden.
is still the absolute best shoe on the market. For my body and foot, the combination of fit, support and cushioning are unbeatable. I prefer the traditional type of shoe with a normal tongue. The sock-type shoes tend to be too tight for me and I feel trapped and get to much pressure on the upper part. The 
is borderline for me though. If I was to use a sock-type shoe, the Court FF 2 would be the one. The combination of cushioning and support in a pretty light package is spot on. It is almost comparable with Gel Res 7 in each and every category and it would have been very interesting to try the Court FF 2 with a normal tongue.
, I considered the new 
(“a handful name”), but just felt the fit was slightly better for my high-arched feet in the Asics Gel Resolution. When you purchase a new pair of tennis shoes, like with a tennis racquet, testing them is of course always advised. But if you want my opinion about these shoes, keep reading this Asics Gel Resolution 7 shoe review.
was that the heel section of the shoe felt a bit too roomy at times, and it made me look for a bit more support. The Asics Gel Resolution 7 makes my feet feel more locked-in, and they offer better support than the predecessor. With my recent knee injury woes, good support and cushioning was exactly what I was looking for and these shoes really do that well for me.
for example. But then you usually have to sacrifice a heavier feel and a longer break-in period. Asics Gel Resolution 7 offers decent durability. Not worse and not much better either than most tennis shoes. Most wear and tear is on the soles and that is a good sign. Compared to the 
(
is a good one.
which offer amazing comfort, but the durability have always been an issue there and I think the Asics Gel Resolution 7 are a more all-round alternative.
for a couple of months and I do enjoy them quite a bit. Not as much as my beloved 
to be honest, but I have slightly narrow feet so they just fit me better. I used to use the 
, which is a great shoe, but I think I had the same issue with those shoes as I have with the Amplifeel ones – they didn’t breathe well and my feet ended up sweating far more than they usually do.
for example, but I have other issues with those shoes). My feet fit nice and snug and the increase in stability make me feel confident in making big strides towards the ball. What I notice more is that the shoes become quite warm so if you have a sweaty feet or play in hot climates, I would think this might be an annoyance for you.